Methane activation and oxidation over La0.8Sr0.2Ga0.8Mg0.2O3: H/D exchange study
Abstract
The mechanism of methane activation and oxidation over La0.8Sr0.2Ga0.8Mg0.2O3−α (LSGM) has been investigated using hydrogen isotope exchange with gas phase equilibration. The measurements have been conducted in a temperature range of 300–700 °C in pure methane and in a mixture of methane and hydrogen under pCH4 of 100, 200, and 500 Pa and pH2 of 200 Pa. LSGM has been shown to exhibit catalytic activity to C−H bond splitting in methane in the temperature range of 550–700 °C. The mechanism of methane activation comprises two parallel reaction pathways, with the first pathway related to CH3 and H species formation and the second pathway related to stepwise methane dissociation to carbon atoms. The ability of LSGM to consume hydrogen from methane is determined. The formation of carbon deposit and CO on LSGM decomposition was observed at temperature ≥ 750 °C.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Sadykov VA, Eremeev NF, Sadovskaya EM, Shlyakhtina AV, Pikalova EY, Osinkin DA, Yaremchenko AA. Design of materials for solid oxide fuel cells, permselective membranes, and catalysts for biofuel transformation into syngas and hydrogen based on fundamental studies of their real structure, transport properties, and surface reactivity. Curr Opin Green Sustain Chem. 2022;33:100558. doi:10.1016/j.cogsc.2021.100558
Duan CC, Tong JH, Shang M, Nikodemski S, Sanders M, Ricote S, Almansoori A, O'Hayre R. Readily processed protonic ceramic fuel cells with high performance at low temperatures. Sci. 2015;349:1321–1326. doi:10.1126/science.aab3987
Shi N, Xue S, Xie Y, Yang Y, Huan D, Pan Y, Peng R, Xia C, Zhan Z, Lu Y. Co-generation of electricity and olefin via proton conducting fuel cells using (Pr0.3Sr0.7)0.9Ni0.1Ti0.9O3 catalyst layers. Appl Catal B Environ. 2020;272:118973. doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.118973
Vøllestad E, Strandbakke R, Tarach M, Catalán-Martínez D, Fontaine M-L, Beeaff D, Clark DR, Serra JM, Norby T. Mixed proton and electron conducting double perovskite anodes for stable and efficient tubular proton ceramic electrolysers. Nat Mater. 2019;18:752–759. doi:10.1038/s41563-019-0388-2
Bausá N, Escolástico S, Serra JM. Direct CO2 conversion to syngas in a BaCe0.2Zr0.7Y0.1O3- δ-based proton-conducting electrolysis cell. J CO2 Util. 2019;34:231−238. doi:10.1016/j.jcou.2019.05.037
Tucker MC. Progress in metal-supported solid oxide electrolysis cells: A review. Int J Hydrogen Energ. 2020;45:24203–24218. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.06.300
Duan C, Kee R, Zhu H, Sullivan N, Zhu L, Bian L, Dylan J, O’Hayre R. Highly efficient reversible protonic ceramic electrochemical cells for power generation and fuel production. Nat Energy. 2019;4:230–240. doi:10.1038/s41560-019-0333-2
Langguth J, Dittmeyer R, Hofmann H, Tomandl G. Studies on oxidative coupling of methane using high-temperature proton-conducting membranes. Appl Catal A Gen. 1997;158:287−305. doi:10.1016/S0926-860X(96)00375-4
Karagiannakis G, Zisekas S, Kokkofitis C, Stoukides M. Effect of H2O presence on the propane decomposition reaction over Pd in a proton conducting membrane reactor. Appl Catal A Gen. 2006;301:265−271. doi:10.1016/j.apcata.2005.12.017
Malerød-Fjeld H, Clark D, Yuste-Tirados I, Zanón R, Catalán-Martinez D, Beeaff D, Morejudo SH, Vestre PK, Norby T, Haugsrud R, Serra JM, Kjølseth C. Thermo-electrochemical production of compressed hydrogen from methane with near-zero energy loss. Nat Energy. 2019;2:923–931. doi:10.1038/s41560-017-0029-4
Morejudo SH, Zanón R, Escolástico S, Yuste-Tirados I, Malerød-Fjeld H, Vestre PK, Coors WG, Martínez A, Norby T, Serra JM, Kjølseth C. Direct conversion of methane to aromatics in a catalytic co-ionic membrane reactor. Sci. 2016;353:563-6. doi:10.1126/science.aag0274
Meng Y, Gao J, Zhao Z, Amoroso J, Tong J, Brinkman KS. Review: recent progress in low-temperature proton-conducting ceramics. J Mater Sci. 2019;54:9291−9312. doi:10.1007/s10853-019-03559-9
Merkle R, Hoedl MF, Raimondi G, Zohourian R, Maier J. Oxides with Mixed Protonic and Electronic Conductivity. Annu Rev Mater Res. 2021;51:461–493. doi:10.1146/annurev-matsci-091819-010219
Osinkin D, Porotnikova N, Khodimchuk AV. Features of exchange kinetics of BaFeO3−δ-based triple-conducting materials: current state of research. J Mater Chem A. 2025;13:27907. doi:10.1039/D5TA03192C
Danilov NA, Starostina IA, Starostin GN, Kasyanova AV, Medvedev DA, Shao Z. Fundamental Understanding and Applications of Protonic Y- and Yb-Coped Ba(Ce,Zr)O3 Perovskites: State-of-the-Art and Perspectives. Adv Energy Mater. 2023;13:2302172. doi:10.1002/aenm.202302175
Egorova A, Belova K, Animitsa I. Doping effects on the structure, transport properties, and chemical stability of LaInO3 perovskite: A review. Chim Techn Acta. 2025;12(1):1211. doi:10.15826/chimtech.2025.12.1.11
Zakharov DM, Zhuravlev NA, Denisova TA, Belozerov AS, Stroeva AYu, Vovkotrub EG, Farlenkov AS, Ananyev MV. Catalytic methane activation over La1−xSrxScO3−α proton-conducting oxide surface: a comprehensive study. J Catal. 2021;394:67–82. doi:10.1016/j.jcat.2020.12.011
Kreuer KD. Proton-conducting oxides. Annu Rev Mater Res 2003;33:333–359. doi:10.1146/annurev.matsci.33.022802.091825
Ananyev MV, Farlenkov AS, Kurumchin EKh. Isotopic exchange between hydrogen from the gas phase and proton-conducting oxides: Theory and experiment. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2018;43:13373-13382. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.05.150
Gordeev E, Porotnikova N. Approaches for the preparation of dense ceramics and sintering aids for Sr/Mg doped lanthanum gallate: focus review. Electrochem Mater Technol. 2023;2:20232022. doi:10.15826/elmattech.2023.2.022
Gordeev E, Belyakov S, Antonova E, Osinkin D. Highly Conductive Fe-Doped (La,Sr)(Ga,Mg)O3−δ Solid-State Membranes for Electrochemical Application. Membranes. 2023;13(5):502. doi:10.3390/membranes13050502
Huang K, Tichy RS, Goodenough JB. Superior Perovskite Oxide-Ion Conductor; Strontium-and Magnesium-Doped LaGaO3: I, Phase Relationships and Electrical Properties. J Am Ceram Soc. 2005;81:2565–2575. doi:10.1111/j.1151-2916.1998.tb02662.x
Kharton VV, Shaula AL, Vyshatko NP, Marques FMB. Electron-hole transport in (La0.9Sr0.1)0.98Ga0.8Mg0.2O3−δ electrolyte: effects of ceramic microstructure. Electrochimica Acta. 2003;48:1817–1828. doi:10.1016/S0013-4686(03)00247-0
Li M, Zhang Y, An M, Lu Z, Huang X, Xiao J, Wei B, Zhu X, Su W. Synthesis and characterization of La0.9Sr0.1Ga0.8Mg0.2O3−δ intermediate-temperature electrolyte using conventional solid-state reaction. J Power Sources. 2012;218:233 –236. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.06.101
Huang K, Feng M, Goodenough JB. Sol-Gel Synthesis of a New Oxide-Ion Conductor Sr-and Mg-Doped LaGaO3 Perovskite. J Am Ceram Soc. 1996;79:1100–1104. doi:10.1111/j.1151-2916.1996.tb08554.x
Morales M, Roa JJ, Tartaj J, Segarra M. A review of doped lanthanum gallates as electrolytes for intermediate temperature solid oxides fuel cells: From materials processing to electrical and thermo-mechanical properties. J Eur Ceram Soc. 2016;36:1−16. doi:10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2015.09.025
Hayashi H, Suzuki M, Inaba H. Thermal expansion of Sr- and Mg-doped LaGaO3. Solid State Ionics. 2000;128:131−139. doi:10.1016/S0167-2738(99)00346-X
He C, Wu J, Lee Y. Correlation between conductivity and structural parameters in Sr-doped LaMO3 (M = Al, Ga, In, Er, and Y) for solid oxide membranes. Solid State Ionics. 2023;399:116315. doi:10.1016/j.ssi.2023.116315
Ishihara T. Oxygen surface exchange and diffusion in LaGaO3 based perovskite type oxides. Solid State Ionics. 1998;113–115:593–600. doi:10.1016/S0167-2738(98)00390-7
Yamaji K, Horita T, Sakai N, Yokokawa H. Comparison between La0.9Ba0.1Ga0.8Mg0.2O2.85 and La0.9Sr0.1Ga0.8Mg0.2O2.85 as SOFCs electrolytes. Solid State Ionics. 2002;152–153:517–523. doi:10.1016/S0167-2738(02)00352-1
Vdovin GK, Kurumchin EKh, Isaeva EV, Bronin DI. Isotopic Exchange and Oxygen Diffusion in the La0.88Sr0.12Ga0.82Mg0.18O3–α–Molecular Oxygen System. Russ J Electrochem. 2001;37:304–307. doi:10.1023/A:1009085532471
Kurumchin EKh, Ananjev MV, Vdovin GK, Surkova MG. Exchange kinetics and diffusion of oxygen in systems based on lanthanum gallate. Russ J Electrochem. 2010;46:205–211. doi:10.1134/S1023193510020126
Porotnikova N, Khodimchuk A, Gordeev E, Osinkin D. Effect of doping with iron and cations deficiency in the high conductive electrolyte La0.8Sr0.2Ga0.8Mg0.2O3–δ on oxygen exchange kinetics. Solid State Ionics. 2024;417:116704. doi:10.1016/j.ssi.2024.116704
Filonova E, Medvedev D. Recent Progress in the Design, Characterisation and Application of LaAlO3- and LaGaO3-Based Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Electrolytes. Nanomater. 2022;12:1991. doi:10.3390/nano12121991
Ma G, Zhang F, Zhu J, Meng G. Proton Conduction in La0.9Sr0.1Ga0.8Mg0.2O3−α. Chem Mater. 2006;18:6006-6011. doi:10.1021/cm0612954
Zhang F, Yang Q, Pan B, Xu R, Wang H, Ma G. Proton conduction in La0.9Sr0.1Ga0.8Mg0.2O3−α ceramic prepared via microemulsion method and its application in ammonia synthesis at atmospheric pressure. Mater Lett. 2007;61:4144–4148. doi:10.1016/j.matlet.2007.01.060
Chen C, Ma G. Preparation, proton conduction, and application in ammonia synthesis at atmospheric pressure of La0.9Ba0.1Ga1–xMgxO3–α. J Mater Sci. 2008;43:5109–5114. doi:10.1007/s10853-008-2747-2
Zakharov DM, Gordeev EV, Fedorova KA. Hydrogen activation and surface exchange over La0.8Sr0.2Ga0.8Mg0.2O3–z. J Solid State Chem. 2025;341:125073. doi:10.1016/j.jssc.2024.125073
Zakharov DM, Gordeev EV, Shadrina MA, Suntsov AYu, Osinkin DA. Effect of Fe-doping and red-ox conditions on hydrogen surface exchange between H2 and lanthanum gallate. Appl Surf Sci. 2025;714:164383. doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2025.164383
Ishihara T, Hiei Y, Takita Y. Oxidative reforming of methane using solid oxide fuel cell with LaGaO3-based electrolyte. Solid State Ionics. 1995;79:371−375. doi:10.1016/0167-2738(95)00090-s
Ishihara T, Takita Y. Partial oxidation of methane into syngas with oxygen permeating ceramic membrane reactors. Catal Surv Jpn. 2001;4:125−133. doi:10.1023/A:1011407421210
Ishihara T, Tsuruta Y, Todaka T, Nishiguchi H, Takita Y. Fe doped LaGaO3 perovskite oxide as an oxygen separating membrane for CH4 partial oxidation. Solid State Ionics. 2002;152−153:709−714. doi:10.1016/s0167-2738(02)00413-7
Bi Z, Matsumoto H, Ishihara T. Solid-state amperometric CH4 sensor using, LaGaO3-based electrolyte. Solid State Ionics. 2008;179:1641−1644. doi:10.1016/j.ssi.2007.11.018
Omoze Igenegbai V, Almallahi R, Meyer RJ, Linic S. Oxidative Coupling of Methane over Hybrid Membrane/Catalyst Active Centers: Chemical Requirements for Prolonged Lifetime. ACS Energy Lett. 2019;4:1465−1470. doi:10.1021/acsenergylett.9b01075
Sim Y, Kwon D, An S, Ha J-M, Oh T-S, Jung JC. Catalytic behavior of ABO3 perovskites in the oxidative coupling of methane. Mol Catal. 2020;489:110925. doi:10.1016/j.mcat.2020.110925
Gan R, Nishida Y, Haneda M. Effect of B Site Substitution on the Catalytic Activity of La-Based Perovskite for Oxidative Coupling of Methane. Phys Status Solidi B. 2022;259:2100544. doi:10.1002/pssb.202100544
Yamashita H, Machiba Y, Tomita A. Oxidative coupling of methane with peroxide ions over barium-lanthanum-oxygen mixed oxide. Appl Catal A Gen. 1991;79:203−214. doi:10.1016/0926-860X(91)80006-K
Takanabe K. Catalytic Conversion of Methane: Carbon Dioxide Reforming and Oxidative Coupling. J Jpn Pet Inst.2012;55:1−12. English. Available from: https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jpi/55/1/55_1_1/_pdf, Accessed on 14 October 2025
Wang H, Cong Y, Yang W. Oxidative coupling of methane in Ba0.5Sr0.5Co0.8Fe0.2O3−δ tubular membrane reactors. Catal Today. 2005;104:160−167. doi:10.1016/j.cattod.2005.03.079
Luo L, Tang X, Wang W, Wang Y, Sun S, Qi F, Huang W. Methyl Radicals in Oxidative Coupling of Methane Directly Confirmed by Synchrotron VUV Photoionization Mass Spectroscopy. Sci Rep. 2013;3:1625. doi:10.1038/srep01625
Ananyev MV, Zakharov DM. H/D isotopic exchange between methane and a proton-conducting oxide: theory and experiment. Catal Sci Technol. 2020;10:3561. doi:10.1039/c9cy02566a
Zakharov DM, Ananyev MV. Methane dissociation mechanism on Ni–La1-xSrxScO3-δ cermet for proton ceramic electrochemical devices. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2022;47:16824–16839. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.03.171
Zakharov DM, Ananyev MV. Interaction of hydrocarbons containing four hydrogen atoms with condensed phases: Classification of H/D exchange mechanisms and mechanism selection algorithm. J Catal. 2025;448:116173. doi:10.1016/j.jcat.2025.116173
Guczi L, Hoffer T, Tetenyl P, Shestov AA. Kinetic and tracer studies on methanol conversion over supported platinum catalysts. Chem Eng Commun. 1989;83:75–86. doi:10.1080/00986448908940653
Dychalska A, Popielarski P, Franków W, Fabisiak K, Paprocki K, Szybowicz M, Study of CVD diamond layers with amorphous carbon admixture by Raman scattering spectroscopy. Mater Sci Pol. 2015;33:799−805. doi:10.1515/msp-2015-0067
Kemball C. Reaction of methane and deuterium on evaporated nickel catalysts. Proc R Soc Lond A. 1951;207(1091):539-554. doi:10.1098/rspa.1951.0139
Larson JG, Hall WK. VII. Studies of hydrogen held by solids. The exchange of the hydroxyl group of alumina and silica-alumina catalyst with deuterated methane. J Phys Chem-US. 1985;69:3080-3089. doi:10.1021/j100893a044
Quanzhi L, Amenomiya Y. Exchange reaction of methane on some oxide catalyst. Appl Catal. 1986;23(1):173-182. doi:10.1016/S0166-9834(00)81460-8
Vaylon J, Engelhardt J, Kallo D, Hegedus M. The activation of CD4 for H/D exchange over H-zeolites. Catal Lett. 2002;82(1-2):29−35. doi:10.1023/A:1020579705752
Engelhardt J, Valyon J. H/D exchange between CD4 and the OH-groups of H-zeolites and γ-Al2O3. React Kinet Catal Lett. 2001;74:217-224. doi:10.1023/A:1017972624428
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15826/chimtech.9185
Copyright (c) 2025 Dmitriy M. Zakharov

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Chimica Techno Acta, 2014–2025
eISSN 2411-1414
Copyright Notice






