Cover Image

The catalytic effect of graphene oxide with varying degrees of oxidation with respect to the water dissociation reaction on bipolar membranes

Denis Bondarev, Alexander Bespalov, Victor Zabolotsky

Abstract


The article presents the results of a study on the catalytic activity in the water dissociation reaction and the chemical structure of oxidized graphene samples with various degrees of oxidation. The catalytic activity was investigated using asymmetric bipolar membranes with a homogeneous anion-exchange layer based on a copolymer of N,N-diallyl-N,N-dimethylammonium chloride and ethylmethacrylate. It was shown that graphene oxidized by the Hummers’ method significantly accelerates the water dissociation process due to the presence of carboxyl and phenolic groups in its chemical structure. Graphene reduced by sodium borohydride and graphene oxidized by sodium dichromate exhibited significantly lower catalytic activity (Ub = 2.9 V and 2.8 V, respectively, at 3.75 mA/cm²) than graphene oxidized by Hummers’ method (Ub = 0.39 V at 3.5 mA/cm²). Compared to the initial asymmetric bipolar membrane (Ub = 7.0 V at 3.75 mA/cm²), a more than two-fold decrease in the overvoltage of the bipolar region was observed. In the first case, this is attributed to the high electronic conductivity of the catalyst, and in the second case, to the residual content of carboxylic and phenolic groups. The chemical structure of the oxidized and reduced graphene samples was studied by IR spectroscopy and quantum chemical methods at the r2scan-3c level. The presence of hydroxyl, carboxyl, carbonyl, and epoxy groups in the structure of oxidized graphene was confirmed both experimentally and theoretically. It was also established that the Lerf-Klinowski model of oxidized graphene agrees best with the experimental data.

Keywords


graphene oxide; reduced graphene; asymmetric bipolar membranes; impedance; quantum chemical modeling

Full Text:

PDF

References


Huang C, Xu T. Electrodialysis with bipolar membranes for sustainable development. Environ Sci Technol. 2006;40(17):5233-5243. doi:10.1021/es060039p

Zabolotskii V, Sheldeshov N, Melnikov S. Heterogeneous bipolar membranes and their application in electrodialysis. Desalination. 2014;342:183-203. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2013.11.043

Öner MR, Kanca A, Ata ON, Yapıcı S, Yaylalı NA. Bipolar membrane electrodialysis for mixed salt water treatment: Evaluation of parameters on process performance. J Environ Chem Eng. 2021;9(4):105750. doi:10.1016/j.jece.2021.105750

Pärnamäe R, Mareev S, Nikonenko V, Melnikov S, Sheldeshov N, Zabolotskii V, Tedesco M. Bipolar membranes: A review on principles, latest developments, and applications. J Memb Sci. 2021;617:118538. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2020.118538

McDonald MB, Freund MS. Graphene oxide as a water dissociation catalyst in the bipolar membrane interfacial layer. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2014;6(16):13790-13797. doi:10.1021/am503242v

McDonald MB, Bruce JP, McEleney K, Freund MS. Reduced graphene oxide bipolar membranes for integrated solar water splitting in optimal pH. ChemSusChem. 2015;8(16):2645-2654. doi:10.1002/cssc.201500538

Wang H, Ding F, Jin G, Li C, Meng H. Ultra-thin graphene oxide intermediate layer for bipolar membranes using atomizing spray assembly. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp. 2017;520:114-120. doi:10.1016/j.colsurfa.2017.01.041

Manohar M, Das AK, Shahi VK. Efficient bipolar membrane with functionalized graphene oxide interfacial layer for water splitting and converting salt into acid/base by electrodialysis. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2018;57(4):1129-1136. doi:10.1021/acs.iecr.7b03885

Yan Z, Zhu L, Li YC, Wycisk RJ, Pintauro PN, Hickner MA, Mallouk TE. The balance of electric field and interfacial catalysis in promoting water dissociation in bipolar membranes. Energy Environ Sci. 2018;11(8):2235-2245. doi:10.1039/C8EE01192C

Chen Y, Wrubel JA, Klein WE, Kabir S, Smith WA, Neyerlin KC, Deutsch TG. High-performance bipolar membrane development for improved water dissociation. ACS Appl Polym Mater. 2020;2(11):4559-4569. doi:10.1021/acsapm.0c00653

Metlay AS, YoonY, Schulte L, Gao T, Mallouk TE. Langmuir–Blodgett Deposition of Graphite Oxide Nanosheets as Catalysts for Bipolar Membrane Electrochemistry. ACS Appl Energy Mater. 2024;7(16):7125-7130. doi:10.1021/acsaem.4c01602

Luo F, Yu W, Li X, Liang X, Li W, Duan F, Xu T. Enhanced bipolar membranes for durable ampere-level water electrolysis. Energy Environ Sci. 2025;18(2):728-737. doi:10.1039/D4EE04524F

Hofmann U, König E. Untersuchungen über graphitoxyd. Z Anorg Allg Chem. 1937;234(4):311-336. doi:10.1002/zaac.19372340405

Dreyer DR, Park S, Bielawski CW, Ruoff RS. The chemistry of graphene oxide. Chem Soc Rev. 2010;39(1):228-240. doi:10.1039/B917103G

Lerf A, He H, Forster M, Klinowski J. Structure of graphite oxide revisited. J Phys Chem B. 1998;102(23):4477-4482. doi:10.1021/jp9731821

Szabó T, Berkesi O, Forgó P, Josepovits K, Sanakis Y, Petridis D, Dékány I. Evolution of surface functional groups in a series of progressively oxidized graphite oxides. Chem Mater. 2006;18(11):2740-2749. doi:10.1021/cm060258+

Dimiev A, Kosynkin DV, Alemany LB, Chaguine P, Tour JM. Pristine graphite oxide. J Am Chem Soc. 2012;134(5):2815-2822. doi:10.1021/ja211346y

Dimiev AM, Tour JM. Mechanism of graphene oxide formation. ACS Nano. 2014;8(3):3060-3068. doi:10.1021/nn500606a

Brisebois PP, Siaj M. Harvesting graphene oxide–years 1859 to 2019: a review of its structure, synthesis, properties and exfoliation. J Mater Chem C. 2020;8(5):1517-1547. doi:10.1039/C9TC03251G

Tao W, Lan Y, Zhang J, Zhu L, Liu Q, Yang Y, Zhang S. Revealing the chemical nature of functional groups on graphene oxide by integrating potentiometric titration and ab initio calculations. ACS Omega. 2023;8(27):24332-24340. doi:10.1021/acsomega.3c01596

Boukhvalov DW, Katsnelson MI. Modeling of graphite oxide. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130(32):10697-10701. doi:10.1021/ja8021686

Li Z, Xu Z, Gao C. Selective proximate antarafacial distribution of oxidized functional groups on graphene oxide. J Phys Chem C. 2024;128(3):1323-1331. doi:10.1021/acs.jpcc.3c06315

Chua CK, Pumera M. Reduction of graphene oxide with substituted borohydrides. J Mater Chem A. 2013;1(5):1892-1898. doi:10.1039/C2TA00665K

Muda MR, Ramli MM, Isa SS. Jamlos MF, Murad SAZ, Norhanisah Z, Khalid N. Fundamental study of reduction graphene oxide by sodium borohydride for gas sensor application. AIP Conf Proc. 2017;1808(1):020034. doi:10.1063/1.4975267

Park S, An J, Potts JR, Velamakanni A, Murali S, Ruoff RS. Hydrazine-reduction of graphite-and graphene oxide. Carbon. 2011;49(9):3019-3023. doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2011.02.071

Zhang J, Yang H, Shen G, Cheng P, Zhang J, Guo S. Reduction of graphene oxide via L-ascorbic acid. Chem Commun (Camb). 2010;46(7):1112-1114. doi:10.1039/B917705A

De Silva KKH, Huang HH, Yoshimura M. Progress of reduction of graphene oxide by ascorbic acid. Appl Surf Sci. 2018;447:338-346. doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.03.243

Mohan VB, Brown R, Jayaraman K, Bhattacharyya D. Characterisation of reduced graphene oxide: Effects of reduction variables on electrical conductivity. Mater Sci Eng B. 2015;193:49-60. doi:10.1016/j.mseb.2014.11.002

Rao S, Upadhyay J, Polychronopoulou K, Umer R, Das R. Reduced graphene oxide: Effect of reduction on electrical conductivity. J Compos Sci. 2018;2(2):25. doi:10.3390/jcs2020025

Bondarev D, Melnikov S, Zabolotskiy V. New homogeneous and bilayer anion-exchange membranes based on N, N-diallyl-N, N-dimethylammonium chloride and ethyl methacrylate copolymer. J Memb Sci. 2023;675:121510. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2023.121510

Berezina NP, Kononenko NA. Structural organization of ion-exchange membranes. Krasnodar: Kuban State University; 1996. 49 p. Russian

Neese F. The ORCA program system. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Mol Sci. 2012;2(1):73-78. doi:10.1002/wcms.81

Neese F. Software update: The ORCA program system—Version 5.0. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Mol Sci. 2022;12(5):e1606. doi:10.1002/wcms.1606

Grimme S, Hansen A, Ehlert S, Mewes JM. r2SCAN-3c: A "Swiss army knife" composite electronic-structure method. J Chem Phys. 2021;154(6):064103. doi:10.1063/5.0040021

Caldeweyher E, Ehlert S, Hansen A, Neugebauer H, Spicher S, Bannwarth C, Grimme S. A generally applicable atomic-charge dependent London dispersion correction. J Chem Phys. 2019;150(15):154122. doi:10.1063/1.5090222

Kruse H, Grimme S. A geometrical correction for the inter-and intra-molecular basis set superposition error in Hartree-Fock and density functional theory calculations for large systems. J Chem Phys. 2012;136(15):154101. doi:10.1063/1.3700154

Tikhonov DS, Gordiy I, Iakovlev DA, Gorislav AA, Kalinin MA, Nikolenko SA, Schnell M. Harmonic Scale Factors of Fundamental Transitions for Dispersion‐corrected Quantum Chemical Methods. ChemPhysChem. 2024;25(23):e202400547. doi:10.1002/cphc.202400547

Bondarev DA, Bespalov AV, Sheldeshov NV, Zabolotskii VI. Poluchenie i elektrokhimicheskie kharakteristiki bipolyarnoi membrany s kataliticheskoi dobavkoi na osnove okislennogo grafita. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg State University of Technology and Design. Ser 1: Natural and Technical Sciences. 2022;(2):18-24. Russian

Bondarev DA, Achoh AR, Bespalov AV, Melnikov SS, Sharafan MV, Zabolotskiy VI. Use of electrochemical impedance spectroscopy to assess the stability of the anion exchange membrane MA-41, modified by poly-N, N-diallylmorpholine bromide in overlimiting current modes. Chimica Techno Acta. 2023;10(4): 202310404. doi:10.15826/chimtech.2023.10.4.04

Kazitsyna LA, Kupletskaya NB. Application of UV, IR, and NMR spectroscopy in organic chemistry. Moscow: Vysshaya Shkola; 1971. 264 p. Russian

Muzyka R, Drewniak S, Pustelny T, Chrubasik M, Gryglewicz G. Characterization of graphite oxide and reduced graphene oxide obtained from different graphite precursors and oxidized by different methods using Raman spectroscopy. Materials. 2018;11(7): 1050. doi:10.3390/ma11071050

Lee AY, Yang K, Anh ND, Park C, Lee SM, Lee TG, Jeong MS. Raman study of D* band in graphene oxide and its correlation with reduction. Applied surface science. 2021;536: 147990. doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.147990

Scardaci V, Compagnini G. Raman spectroscopy investigation of graphene oxide reduction by laser scribing. C. 2021;7(2): 48. doi:10.3390/c7020048

Alcaraz A, Holdik H, Ruffing T, Ramı́rez P, Mafé S. AC impedance spectra of bipolar membranes: an experimental study. J Memb Sci. 1998;150(1):43-56. doi:10.1016/S0376-7388(98)00201-4

Blommaert MA, Vermaas DA, Izelaar B, Smith WA. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy as a performance indicator of water dissociation in bipolar membranes. J Mater Chem A. 2019;7(32):19060-19069. doi:10.1039/C9TA04592A

Tao W, Lan Y, Zhang J, Zhu L, Liu Q, Yang Y, Zhang S. Revealing the chemical nature of functional groups on graphene oxide by integrating potentiometric titration and ab initio calculations. ACS Omega. 2023;8(27):24332-24340. doi:10.1021/acsomega.3c01596

Franz RG. Comparisons of pKa and log P values of some carboxylic and phosphonic acids: synthesis and measurement. AAPS PharmSci. 2001;3(2):10. doi:10.1208/ps030210

Jiang Z, Bazianos PP, Yan Z, Rappe AM. Mechanism of water dissociation with an electric field and a graphene oxide catalyst in a bipolar membrane. ACS Catalysis. 2023:13(10):7079-7086. doi:10.1021/acscatal.3c00891

Erickson K, Erni R, Lee Z, Alem N, Gannett W, Zettl A. Determination of the local chemical structure of graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide. Adv Mater. 2010;22(40):4467-4472. doi:10.1002/adma.201000732

Chen Y, Martínez RJ, Gervasio D, Baygents JC, Farrell J. Water splitting promoted by electronically conducting interlayer material in bipolar membranes. J Appl Electrochem. 2020;50(1):33-40. doi:10.1007/s10800-019-01365-4




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15826/chimtech.9134

Copyright (c) 2025 Denis Bondarev, Alexander Bespalov, Victor Zabolotsky

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Scopus logo WorldCat logo DOAJ logo CAS logo BASE logo eLibrary logo

Chimica Techno Acta, 2014–2025
eISSN 2411-1414
Copyright Notice